Re: On Scalability

From: Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: On Scalability
Date: 2010-10-07 15:10:40
Message-ID: AANLkTin1kmCw0hpmtgtA=MYNhVUT4wPKH16JOBu2wwvg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

2010/10/7 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> Excerpts from Vincenzo Romano's message of jue oct 07 10:44:34 -0400 2010:
>
>> Do you mean the check constraint is used as plain text to be (somehow) executed?
>> If this is the case, then you (all) are perfectly and obviously right
>> and I'm just fishing
>> for bicycles in the sea.
>
> Yeah, hence this thread hasn't advanced things very much in any useful
> direction.  That we need to improve the partitioning implementation is
> already known.

Maybe I'm willing to help and possibly able to.
But I need to understand things that are already known but I didn't know yet.

> --
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

--
Vincenzo Romano at NotOrAnd Information Technologies
Software Hardware Networking Training Support Security
--
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-07 15:11:16 Re: O_DSYNC broken on MacOS X?
Previous Message A.M. 2010-10-07 15:07:33 Re: queriing the version of libpq

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2010-10-07 15:12:44 Re: On Scalability
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-10-07 15:07:18 Re: On Scalability