| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: On Scalability |
| Date: | 2010-10-07 15:07:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1286463959-sup-8255@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Excerpts from Vincenzo Romano's message of jue oct 07 10:44:34 -0400 2010:
> Do you mean the check constraint is used as plain text to be (somehow) executed?
> If this is the case, then you (all) are perfectly and obviously right
> and I'm just fishing
> for bicycles in the sea.
Yeah, hence this thread hasn't advanced things very much in any useful
direction. That we need to improve the partitioning implementation is
already known.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A.M. | 2010-10-07 15:07:33 | Re: queriing the version of libpq |
| Previous Message | Vincenzo Romano | 2010-10-07 15:03:40 | Re: On Scalability |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vincenzo Romano | 2010-10-07 15:10:40 | Re: On Scalability |
| Previous Message | Vincenzo Romano | 2010-10-07 15:03:40 | Re: On Scalability |