Re: git: uh-oh

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh
Date: 2010-08-17 19:29:55
Message-ID: AANLkTin1bn87JEA=Szgq=gYFGYwqfOWep_hxA9CfOUaV@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 21:28, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> The tip of every branch, and every single tag, all have the correct
>> data in them, but some revisions in between seem majorly confused.
>
> It seems to me that what we'll need to do here is write a script to
> look through the CVS history of each file and make sure that the
> versions of that file which appear on each branch match the revs in
> CVS in content, order, and the commit message associated with any
> changes.  However, that's not going to do get done today.

Yeah. Unless someone comes up with a good way to fix this, or even
better an explanation why it's actually ont broken and we're looking
at things wrong :D, I think we have no choice but aborting the
conversion for now and come back to it later.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Christensen 2010-08-17 19:35:59 Re: git: uh-oh
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-08-17 19:29:48 Re: git: uh-oh