Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables

From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joachim Worringen <joachim(dot)worringen(at)iathh(dot)de>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables
Date: 2010-05-26 16:47:55
Message-ID: AANLkTimqblKr8jgIldzGKaJ8TNVCWCHsxvPF8s89zT_5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

WAL matters in performance. Hence why it is advisable to have it on a
separate drive :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig James 2010-05-26 17:09:41 Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2010-05-26 16:47:16 Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL