Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables

From: Joachim Worringen <joachim(dot)worringen(at)iathh(dot)de>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables
Date: 2010-05-26 16:03:15
Message-ID: 4BFD4643.9010901@iathh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Am 25.05.2010 12:41, schrieb Andres Freund:
> On Tuesday 25 May 2010 11:00:24 Joachim Worringen wrote:
>> Thanks. So, the Write-Ahead-Logging (being used or not) does not matter?
> It does matter quite significantly in my experience. Both from an io and a cpu
> overhead perspective.

O.k., looks as if I have to make my own experience... I'll let you know
if possible.

Joachim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eliot Gable 2010-05-26 16:06:26 PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-05-26 15:55:04 Re: Random Page Cost and Planner