Re: Continuent & pgsql-announce ... please do not approve

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Continuent & pgsql-announce ... please do not approve
Date: 2010-07-29 20:30:05
Message-ID: AANLkTimjkBmOKE4PgcufNAssL6VJuXxdyG+1DXaygzOr@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> .Org is not the weight behind your SPAM complaints. You will need a
> different bully against that foe.

I think JD has this one right. There may or may not be a reason to
ban Continuent (or anyone else) from our mailing lists, but the fact
that they've sent spam to David Fetter in his personal capacity is not
it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2010-07-29 20:32:57 Re: Continuent & pgsql-announce ... please do not approve
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-07-29 17:59:09 Re: Continuent & pgsql-announce ... please do not approve