| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump -X |
| Date: | 2011-03-18 13:46:38 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimionrBcW2WSF+jEnvKwozOL4cceiRUOxaiQ5Nv@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Presumably the point of deprecating the feature is that we'd
>>> eventually remove it. If 4 major releases isn't long enough, what is?
>>
>> Good point.
>
> Unless there are further objections, I think we should go ahead and remove this.
>
> If there ARE further objections, then please say what release you
> think it would be OK to remove it in, or why you think it's worth
> keeping around indefinitely given that the last version in which it
> was documented is now EOL.
Hearing no further objections, I have removed this code.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-18 14:10:03 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-03-18 13:40:22 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |