| From: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)debian(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Date: | 2011-02-11 19:53:53 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimCwphyDHq60gVymXfKKKPv9mH1NqYCt_nsMTiQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Why do we have to involve the whole of PostgreSQL? Since the only piece
> that links to libreadline is psql, perhaps we could fix this by having
> only psql optionally use GnuTLS. (I don't know if you can make an
> OpenSSL server talk to a GnuTLS client -- are these things supposed to
> be interoperable?)
I agree with this: barring shockingly convenient engineering details,
my plan was to just evaluate the option of doing this for the psql
client.
--
fdr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Charles.McDevitt | 2011-02-11 19:55:14 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-02-11 19:52:52 | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3 |