Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-06-17 20:40:12
Message-ID: AANLkTiliUJprffFVZfwxGZX0bAO6DnfgFrc0YNHyr75G@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Since there are no other votes for that option (or, indeed, any other
>> option), I'm going to go with my original instinct and change hstore
>> => text[] to hstore & text[].  Patch to do that is attached.
>
> If what that operator is doing is appending an array of text to an
> Hstore, shouldn't we use || instead?

It isn't. || already does what you're saying.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-06-17 20:50:55 Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-06-17 20:39:32 Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>