From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 |
Date: | 2011-01-04 03:26:01 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikTEaLeuHLgRSenzid_=kSRyWMS32RV5aAOGR=X@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>>> And we're not going to be changing the version that's actually used
>>>> for the official binary builds, so all you'll accomplish then is to
>>>> have the buildfarm test something different form what we're shipping.
>
>>> Are you speaking for EDB on that?
>
>> He's not speaking *for* us, but he's absolutely right.
>
> OK, so what about the next question: is EDB running buildfarm members
> that will test the VS version(s) you are using? I don't think Andrew
> is under any obligation to do that for you.
Yes, except for VC++ 2008/Win7 which we use for 9.0. That one remains
on my todo list.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-01-04 03:49:01 | Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-01-04 03:25:22 | Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation |