| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 |
| Date: | 2011-01-03 20:04:27 |
| Message-ID: | 23928.1294085067@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> And we're not going to be changing the version that's actually used
>>> for the official binary builds, so all you'll accomplish then is to
>>> have the buildfarm test something different form what we're shipping.
>> Are you speaking for EDB on that?
> He's not speaking *for* us, but he's absolutely right.
OK, so what about the next question: is EDB running buildfarm members
that will test the VS version(s) you are using? I don't think Andrew
is under any obligation to do that for you.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-01-03 20:15:17 | Re: pg_dump --split patch |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-01-03 19:59:30 | Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 |