Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3
Date: 2010-07-27 17:39:02
Message-ID: AANLkTikPfFm8TRbknpKxvWz9_FQVSi507NKnQLtCmS3f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-users/2010-May/026654.html

It's not obvious that there's an unresolved issue here; downthread
there's some indication this might be an environment problem?

http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-users/2010-May/026658.html

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-07-27 18:04:04 do we need to postpone beta4?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-07-27 17:37:02 Re: Query optimization problem