Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3
Date: 2010-07-27 18:36:21
Message-ID: 4C4F2725.5030603@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-users/2010-May/026654.html
>>
>
> It's not obvious that there's an unresolved issue here; downthread
> there's some indication this might be an environment problem?
>
> http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-users/2010-May/026658.html
>
>

No, I have just reproduced this with a totally vanilla environment.

I think PostGIS probably needs to patch their makefile(s).

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Robinson 2010-07-27 19:07:28 ALTER TABLE ... DISABLE TRIGGER vs. AccessExclusiveLock
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-07-27 18:17:43 Re: do we need to postpone beta4?