Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1?

From: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1?
Date: 2010-11-14 09:47:16
Message-ID: AANLkTikHoCD283CRA0oYDpmvdpu6Sgh-EbSojHM34dOO@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 20:01, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> What's your basis for asserting he's uninterested?  Please have a little
> patience.

My apologies, I was under the impression that he hadn't answered your
request, but he did in the -hackers thread.

Regards,
Marti

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-14 15:55:05 Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2010-11-14 08:46:14 Re: MVCC performance issue