Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
Cc: Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1?
Date: 2010-11-13 18:01:51
Message-ID: 28322.1289671311@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 20:40, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> And, in fact, the game plan is to do that testing and see which default
>> we want. I think it's premature to argue further about this until we
>> have some test results.

> Who will be doing that testing? You said you're relying on Greg Smith
> to manage the testing, but he's obviously uninterested, so it seems
> unlikely that this will go anywhere.

What's your basis for asserting he's uninterested? Please have a little
patience.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mladen Gogala 2010-11-13 18:38:50 Re: MVCC performance issue
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2010-11-13 17:38:07 Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1?