Re: pg_dump -X

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump -X
Date: 2011-03-12 05:19:04
Message-ID: AANLkTik9LS+=0krpGZnDazLri7QzmFE9rOKTtAFaDovk@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 11 00:59:03 -0300 2011:
>>
>> > > At a minimum, we should probably also remove -X no-security-label and
>> > > -X no-unlogged-table-data, which don't exist in any released versions
>> > > (unless you want to count alphas).  But considering that this has been
>> > > deprecated and undocumented since 8.2, I think it might be time to
>> > > pull the plug on -X altogether.
>> >
>> > I remove the new -X options with the attached, applied patch.  The
>> > existing options are not really costing us anything except a few lines
>> > of code.
>>
>> Given that, it seems pretty pointless to remove support for -X options
>> that have existed for years.
>
> I agree.  They are not documented and only are a few C lines.

Presumably the point of deprecating the feature is that we'd
eventually remove it. If 4 major releases isn't long enough, what is?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-03-12 05:56:44 Re: pg_dump -X
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-03-12 05:18:06 new keywords in 9.1