Re: pg_dump -X

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump -X
Date: 2011-03-12 03:36:07
Message-ID: 201103120336.p2C3a7O00270@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 11 00:59:03 -0300 2011:
>
> > > At a minimum, we should probably also remove -X no-security-label and
> > > -X no-unlogged-table-data, which don't exist in any released versions
> > > (unless you want to count alphas). But considering that this has been
> > > deprecated and undocumented since 8.2, I think it might be time to
> > > pull the plug on -X altogether.
> >
> > I remove the new -X options with the attached, applied patch. The
> > existing options are not really costing us anything except a few lines
> > of code.
>
> Given that, it seems pretty pointless to remove support for -X options
> that have existed for years.

I agree. They are not documented and only are a few C lines.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-03-12 05:18:06 new keywords in 9.1
Previous Message Nikhil Sontakke 2011-03-12 03:06:21 Re: Fwd: index corruption in PG 8.3.13