| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyriacos Kyriacou <kyriacosk(at)prime-tel(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MVCC performance issue |
| Date: | 2010-11-12 16:22:08 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTik75NDuHCwhMdJZMKPmWxVPmnOqfQ-EFo8Gu11Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 12 November 2010 16:14, Kyriacos Kyriacou <kyriacosk(at)prime-tel(dot)com>wrote:
>
>
> We are still using PostgreSQL 8.2.4. We are running a 24x7 system and
> database size is over 200Gb so upgrade is not an easy decision!
>
> I have it in my plans so in next few months I will setup new servers and
> upgrade to version 9.
>
>
Everything changed, performance-wise, in 8.3, and there have also been
improvements since then too. So rather than completely changing your
database platform, at least take a look at what work has gone into Postgres
since the version you're using.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/release-8-3.html#AEN87319
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-12 16:28:53 | Re: MVCC performance issue |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2010-11-12 16:22:03 | Re: MVCC performance issue |