Re: MVCC performance issue

From: "Kyriacos Kyriacou" <kyriacosk(at)prime-tel(dot)com>
To: "Thom Brown" <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MVCC performance issue
Date: 2010-11-12 16:14:00
Message-ID: 8BCBF9DB739F034B87FE7C7D30EAE55C240D4BCA@hqex2k.francoudi.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

We are still using PostgreSQL 8.2.4. We are running a 24x7 system and
database size is over 200Gb so upgrade is not an easy decision!

I have it in my plans so in next few months I will setup new servers and
upgrade to version 9.

>> Which version of PostgreSQL are you basing this on?

>>
>>--
>>Thom Brown
>>Twitter: @darkixion
>>IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
>>Registered Linux user: #516935

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyriacos Kyriacou 2010-11-12 16:18:18 Re: MVCC performance issue
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-11-12 16:12:26 Re: postmaster consuming /lots/ of memory with hash aggregate. why?