From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL FDW update |
Date: | 2011-02-22 16:33:25 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTik6EwaO+gMSkX4pwHx0Ayn8K_fgNOdR0ntLHeyT@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> I needed something to test the FDW API patch with, and didn't want to
>> get involved in the COPY API changes, and also wanted to have something
>> that needs real connection management and can push down quals. So I
>> updated the postgresql_fdw patch to work with the latest FDW patch.
>
>> Here. It's a bit of a mess, but it works for simple queries..
>
> I'm going to set this CF item back to Waiting on Author, because (a)
> there doesn't seem to be an actual concrete patch presented at the
> moment, only a stack of hard-to-follow deltas, and (b) the patch
> certainly needs updates for the extension mechanism and committed
> FDW API anyway.
Is anyone actually working on a new version of this patch sufficiently
rapidly that we can expect a new version in the next day or two?
If not, I think we mark this one Returned with Feedback and revisit it for 9.2.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-22 16:34:53 | Re: SR standby hangs |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-22 16:31:22 | Re: Void binary patch |