Re: PostgreSQL FDW update

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL FDW update
Date: 2011-02-22 16:33:25
Message-ID: AANLkTik6EwaO+gMSkX4pwHx0Ayn8K_fgNOdR0ntLHeyT@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> I needed something to test the FDW API patch with, and didn't want to
>> get involved in the COPY API changes, and also wanted to have something
>> that needs real connection management and can push down quals. So I
>> updated the postgresql_fdw patch to work with the latest FDW patch.
>
>> Here. It's a bit of a mess, but it works for simple queries..
>
> I'm going to set this CF item back to Waiting on Author, because (a)
> there doesn't seem to be an actual concrete patch presented at the
> moment, only a stack of hard-to-follow deltas, and (b) the patch
> certainly needs updates for the extension mechanism and committed
> FDW API anyway.

Is anyone actually working on a new version of this patch sufficiently
rapidly that we can expect a new version in the next day or two?

If not, I think we mark this one Returned with Feedback and revisit it for 9.2.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-22 16:34:53 Re: SR standby hangs
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-22 16:31:22 Re: Void binary patch