From: | Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL FDW update |
Date: | 2011-02-23 11:30:05 |
Message-ID: | 20110223203002.F21C.6989961C@metrosystems.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:33:25 -0500
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Is anyone actually working on a new version of this patch sufficiently
> rapidly that we can expect a new version in the next day or two?
>
> If not, I think we mark this one Returned with Feedback and revisit it for 9.2.
I'm working on it.
Fixes for new FDW API have been done, but there are some problems in
SQL generation codes, such as SELECT clause optimization (omitting
unused column from SELECT clause). It would take a while, but I'll
post revised version of the patch tomorrow.
Regards,
--
Shigeru Hanada
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-02-23 13:46:09 | Re: How to extract a value from a record using attnum or attname? |
Previous Message | Jan Urbański | 2011-02-23 10:26:50 | Re: pl/python quoting functions |