Re: PostgreSQL FDW update

From: Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL FDW update
Date: 2011-02-23 11:30:05
Message-ID: 20110223203002.F21C.6989961C@metrosystems.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:33:25 -0500
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Is anyone actually working on a new version of this patch sufficiently
> rapidly that we can expect a new version in the next day or two?
>
> If not, I think we mark this one Returned with Feedback and revisit it for 9.2.

I'm working on it.

Fixes for new FDW API have been done, but there are some problems in
SQL generation codes, such as SELECT clause optimization (omitting
unused column from SELECT clause). It would take a while, but I'll
post revised version of the patch tomorrow.

Regards,
--
Shigeru Hanada

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-02-23 13:46:09 Re: How to extract a value from a record using attnum or attname?
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2011-02-23 10:26:50 Re: pl/python quoting functions