Re: .gitignore patch for coverage builds

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: .gitignore patch for coverage builds
Date: 2011-01-26 22:01:17
Message-ID: AANLkTi=x_deFj6pxouzKkMmJMcuBFOXwKvrNOGeZqAVT@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>> Building for coverage and running the reports littered my tree with
>> files which should probably be in .gitignore for just such a
>> contingency.  Patch attached.
>
> Ick.  That's an awful lot of stuff to have global ignores for.

The "coverage" directory ignore seems a little icky, but the rest
seems unlikely to pick up anything incidental.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-01-26 22:04:59 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove arbitrary ALTER TABLE .. ADD COLUMN restriction.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-01-26 22:01:01 Re: ALTER TYPE 3: add facility to identify further no-work cases