From: | Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Pull keywords dynamically from PostgreSQL headers |
Date: | 2011-01-06 16:42:46 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=nMVb9KZG5Dag=4WmrhdepRojjxB-nrhEwO_WR@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Do you have %PGDIR%/include/postgresql/server/parser directory which
contains gram.h?
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>
*http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic <
jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since this patch is applied, i can't build
> pgAdmin. %pgdir%\include\server\parser doesn't contain a gram.h file.
> What I'm doing wrong?
>
> Ty
> Jasmin
>
> 2011/1/5 Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 06:05, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 18:46, Ashesh Vashi <
>>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Magnus/Dave,
>>>>>
>>>>> This check-in has added one compilation error.
>>>>> The following line introduce an error in file '*pgadmin/db/keywords.c*
>>>>> '
>>>>> *#include <server/parser/gram.h>
>>>>> #include <server/parser/kwlist.h>*
>>>>>
>>>>> Because - these header files does not always find under *`pg_config
>>>>> --includedir`* folder, but can be found under *`pg_config
>>>>> --pkgincludedir`*.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find the patch to resolve the issue. This applies on both master
>>>>> and REL-1_12_PATCHES branch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Looks good in general, but do we actually need to put it on 1.12? The
>>>> keyword build changes were only applied to master, so unless we actually
>>>> *need* it on the back branch, I don't think we should put it there. Is it
>>>> needed for something else as well?
>>>>
>>> You're right.
>>> This patch should only be applied on master.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, confirmed and applied.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Magnus Hagander
>> Me: http://www.hagander.net/
>> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
>>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jasmin Dizdarevic | 2011-01-06 16:50:18 | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Pull keywords dynamically from PostgreSQL headers |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-01-06 16:38:08 | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Pull keywords dynamically from PostgreSQL headers |