| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: wCTE behaviour |
| Date: | 2010-11-14 18:35:05 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=Lm04bR7atcwzxQh_VTAFmFDRZN+-t+7oGx9Ta@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
<marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> wrote:
> In my opinion, all of these should have the same effect: DELETE all rows
> from "foo". Any other option means we're going to have trouble predicting
> how a query is going to behave.
I think it's clear that's the only sensible behavior.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-14 18:37:32 | Re: POSIX shared memory redux |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-11-14 18:12:32 | Re: HOT updates in index-less tables |