| From: | Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: wCTE behaviour |
| Date: | 2010-11-14 18:51:59 |
| Message-ID: | 4CE02FCF.9040509@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2010-11-14 19:35, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
> <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> wrote:
>> In my opinion, all of these should have the same effect: DELETE all rows
>> from "foo". Any other option means we're going to have trouble predicting
>> how a query is going to behave.
> I think it's clear that's the only sensible behavior.
What if CTE's ever get input parameters?
regards,
Yeb Havinga
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Farina | 2010-11-14 19:27:20 | Re: Refactoring the Type System |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-14 18:37:32 | Re: POSIX shared memory redux |