Re: pg_dump --split patch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, dmitry(at)koterov(dot)ru, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Wilson <david(dot)t(dot)wilson(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --split patch
Date: 2011-01-03 20:50:04
Message-ID: AANLkTi=EWmcKmYssXAT+o2tiuH5=RUetmM_SO-oYRdz_@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
>> On the other hand, I can certainly think of times when even a pretty
>> dumb implementation of this would have saved me some time.
>
> You mean like those:
>
>  https://labs.omniti.com/labs/pgtreats/wiki/getddl
>  https://github.com/dimitri/getddl

That's not exactly what I was trying to do, but it's in the ballpark...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-01-03 22:05:48 Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-01-03 20:26:29 Re: back branches vs. VS 2008