Re: back branches vs. VS 2008

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: back branches vs. VS 2008
Date: 2011-01-03 20:26:29
Message-ID: 24421.1294086389@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> But more importantly, the buildfarm is about more than just "official
> build platform" support.

Agreed, we should be testing as many build platforms as possible. I was
just concerned about whether we were losing any coverage.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-01-03 20:50:04 Re: pg_dump --split patch
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-01-03 20:23:59 Re: back branches vs. VS 2008