Re: why two dashes in extension load files

From: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why two dashes in extension load files
Date: 2011-02-16 10:25:40
Message-ID: AANLkTi=Bfb78PpFA5qu+5UaveCq+_=KEs15es6Cfb+xC@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/2/16 Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 14:12, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:26 PM, marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> how about : we use a single dash as the separator, and if the
>>> extension author insists on having a dash in the name, as a punishment
>>> he must duplicate the dash, i.e.:
>>> uuid--ossp-1.0--5.5.sql
>>
>> That has a certain poetic justice to it.
>
> Im not sure I see the poetic justice in trying to punish others for
> *our* arbitrary naming rules. *shrug*
>

We are going to push arbitrary rules anyway.
I now believe (after chating wiht Dim) that the current rules are the
less intrusive and the simplest at the time.
Obviously it is new rules, but after all the -- help a good visibility
for the human eye too.

my-2coolextension--1.2alpha--go2beta.sql ....

--
Cédric Villemain               2ndQuadrant
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-02-16 11:26:34 Re: review: FDW API
Previous Message Lukas Eder 2011-02-16 08:30:43 Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function