Re: Understanding PG9.0 streaming replication feature

From: Ben Carbery <ben(dot)carbery(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Understanding PG9.0 streaming replication feature
Date: 2010-12-21 22:46:36
Message-ID: AANLkTi=3gcEBG0O8kkLy2Xq6zj4YXvbW+8F6Dffx98oN@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

FYI, not looking for a detailed how to here.. I have read the manual twice
and just can't figure which sections are relevant. The manual seems to be
trying to cover all uses simultaneously which is always going to get
confusing :) For example do I need I need WAL archiving or not?

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Ben Carbery <ben(dot)carbery(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am having some trouble trying to figure out how to configure this
> particular scenario..
>
> I have a pair of pg servers that I want to put in a Master/Standby
> configuration. Currently a script dumps the master db every hour, copies it
> to the standby, restores, and restarts the server. The aim is to replace the
> dumps/restores with streaming replication and ensure the standby is always
> up to date.
>
> In this case writes are infrequent, but reads are constant, and I only need
> high availability for reads. I would ideally like both master and standby to
> be available simultaneously to allow load-balancing.
> My confusion seems to be around the fact I don't need failover - my
> applications will detect a master down and immediately start using the
> standby, so there is no need to allow writes on the standby, they will just
> wait for the master to be available again - I am not sure what the minimum
> config needed for this scenario is..
>
> cheers,
>
> Ben
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message TJ O'Donnell 2010-12-21 22:48:16 plpython returns integer[] fails for multi-dimensional array
Previous Message A.M. 2010-12-21 22:36:39 Re: schemaverse!