Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen

From: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen
Date: 2023-04-12 16:31:39
Message-ID: A7124402-17E4-45FD-A927-EA4B82AB947B@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Apr 12, 2023, at 8:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> "hey, I'd like that too"

I like the idea in principle. I have been developing a testing infrastructure in my spare time and would rather not duplicate Andrew's TAP logic. If we get this pushed down into the server itself, all the test infrastructure can use a single, shared solution.

As for the implementation, I just briefly scanned the patch.


Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-04-12 16:37:26 Re: longfin missing gssapi_ext.h
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2023-04-12 16:22:57 Re: longfin missing gssapi_ext.h