Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>,'Andrew Dunstan' <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status
Date: 2004-02-24 14:19:12
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F31E@harris.memetrics.local (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32

> > I will look at c) unless someone comes up with a better idea 
> > or someone else gets in first.
> That would be great. Grab a hold of the cygwin sources.
> winsup/cygwin/ claims that it is in the public 
> domain... needs a closer look that I've given it, but might be a 
> good starting point.

For the heck of it, I went and wedged this file into the source base, and
got this:

 3 of 94 tests failed.

The 7 tests which failed due to timestamp now pass, leaving the three
failures listed in the original post. I don't know about you, but I'm sure
set on option (c) now :-)


Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see 

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-24 15:19:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status
Previous:From: Vic AbellDate: 2004-02-24 13:44:20
Subject: Re: Too-many-files errors on OS X

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Laurent BallesterDate: 2004-02-24 15:01:26
Subject: Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-02-24 12:58:33
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group