Re: How to make a REALLY FAST db server?

From: Ian Linwood <ian(at)dinwoodi(dot)plus(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How to make a REALLY FAST db server?
Date: 2001-09-11 11:17:59
Message-ID: 9urrptosorr0vsf9d9bdnbjdbl4p6vumva@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:14:33 +0000 (UTC), teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind
Glomsrød) wrote:

>> - Hardware: dual / quad Intel class
>
>Athlon gives more bang for the buck - the dual Athlons are _really_
>nice, and have proven stable as well.
>
Agreed, single Athlons are much better than single Intels, but I still
think Intel win in the SMP game. As for stability, I think it's a tad
too early to make such a statement.

>> - Disk: SCSI Raid 1+0
>
>I'd probably go for a 3ware RAID instead... IDE disks are so much
>cheaper nowadays than SCSI, and the premium isn't really justifiable
>anymore.
>
Aargh, No! SCSI is MUCH better under load and more reliable. I've yet
to see an enterprise server utilise IDE raid.

>> - OS: Prolly FreeBSD (FFS is your friend (what with syncs and all) and it
>> can do multi proc support
>
>I'd recommend Linux, which has more mature MP support and scales
>better, but I'm obviously biased :). It's of course very important to
>keep what you are familiar with - a good sysadmin makes a world of
>difference no matter what you're using.

I'd recommend Solaris, which has MUCH more mature MP support!
Linux still has a way to go (although it's getting there very
quickly).

If you do decide to use Linux, check out ReiserFS file system.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tille, Andreas 2001-09-11 11:56:16 Re: Performance question
Previous Message J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) 2001-09-11 11:10:32 Re: a plpgsql documentation and samples