Re: Postgres Permissions Article

From: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres Permissions Article
Date: 2017-03-29 15:05:23
Message-ID: 9d08ec34-0e6b-41de-b929-9c09a5df7915@illuminatedcomputing.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 03/29/2017 06:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Being able to create foreign keys may allow to indirectly
>> discover whether certain values exists in a table which I
>> don't otherwise have access to (by means of failure or
>> success to create a judiciously crafted FK).
>
> Aside from that, an FK can easily be used to cause effective
> denial-of-service, for example preventing rows from being deleted
> within a table, or adding enormous overhead to such a deletion.

Thank you both for taking a look! I agree those are both worthwhile
concerns. It still seems a little strange it is not just part of the
CREATE permission (for example). I understand why not everyone can
create a foreign key, I just have trouble imagining a use case where it
is helpful to separate it from other DDL commands. Anyway, I didn't
write the article to nitpick details like that, but sometimes by asking
"why" you learn new things. I really appreciate your offering your thoughts!

Paul

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Crawford 2017-03-29 15:49:57 Handling psql lost connections
Previous Message Stefan Smith 2017-03-29 14:38:52 Logical Replication: adjacent COMMIT messages with the wrong StartLSN

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-03-29 15:07:18 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve access to parallel query from procedural languages.
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-03-29 15:05:13 Re: Monitoring roles patch