Re: AW: timeout on lock feature

From: "Henryk Szal" <szal(at)doctorq(dot)com(dot)pl>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: timeout on lock feature
Date: 2001-04-18 08:55:19
Message-ID: 9bjkbp$1iqf$1@news.tht.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This option will be OPTIONAL.

Tom Lane wrote in message <23613(dot)987518927(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>...
>Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Added to TODO:
>> * Add SET parameter to timeout if waiting for lock too long
>
>I repeat my strong objection to any global (ie, affecting all locks)
>timeout. Such a "feature" will have unpleasant consequences.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henryk Szal 2001-04-18 09:17:07 Re: Re: timeout on lock feature
Previous Message Henryk Szal 2001-04-18 08:53:20 Re: AW: AW: timeout on lock feature