Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Andrei Zubkov <zubkov(at)moonset(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements
Date: 2023-10-24 11:54:28
Message-ID: 9ba4d9eb-1481-489c-a1ec-ce1893e8ec15@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24.10.23 09:58, Andrei Zubkov wrote:
> During last moving to the current commitfest this patch have lost its
> reviewers list. With respect to reviewers contribution in this patch, I
> think reviewers list should be fixed.

I don't think it's the purpose of the commitfest app to track how *has*
reviewed a patch. The purpose is to plan and allocate *current* work.
If we keep a bunch of reviewers listed on a patch who are not actually
reviewing the patch, then that effectively blocks new reviewers from
signing up and the patch will not make progress.

Past reviewers should of course be listed in the commit message, the
release notes, etc. as appropriate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-10-24 12:29:49 Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Previous Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2023-10-24 11:52:01 Open a streamed block for transactional messages during decoding