Re: Allow auto_explain to log to NOTICE

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Dunstan <tom(at)tomd(dot)cc>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io
Subject: Re: Allow auto_explain to log to NOTICE
Date: 2019-01-04 12:06:24
Message-ID: 9ac1f11a-a9e8-743c-bf94-1a8ba1ba7dab@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26/12/2018 06:42, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:44:42AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Circling back to this, I updated the patch with providing another
>> option as I couldn’t think of another way to do it cleanly. I’ll
>> add the patch to the next CF but as it’s just about to start it
>> should be moved to the next once started.

Do we really want to add user-facing options just to be able to run
tests? Should we write the tests differently instead?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2019-01-04 12:07:48 Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2019-01-04 11:34:58 Re: commit fest app: Authors