FW: Performance 8.4.0

From: Chris Dunn <chris(dot)dunn(at)bigredsky(dot)com>
To: "'pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: FW: Performance 8.4.0
Date: 2009-08-03 02:04:22
Message-ID: 9DD841FFB22DB8468E2AF1F1CA3844E8B0FC9775EA@brs-exchange.BigRedSky.corp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

The database is 8gb currently. Use to be a lot bigger but we removed all large objects out and developed a file server storage for it, and using default page costs for 8.4, I did have it changed in 8.1.4

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Sunday, 2 August 2009 11:26 PM
To: Chris Dunn
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Performance 8.4.0

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Chris Dunn<chris(dot)dunn(at)bigredsky(dot)com> wrote:
> constraint_exclusion = on

This is critical if you need it, but a waste of CPU time if you don't.
Other than that your paramaters look good. Are you using the default
page cost settings? I see you have 12 GB RAM; how big is your
database?

...Robert

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2009-08-03 02:04:58 Re: Greenplum MapReduce
Previous Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2009-08-02 20:55:29 Re: Why is PostgreSQL so slow on Windows ( Postgres 8.3.7) version