Re: FW: Performance 8.4.0

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chris Dunn <chris(dot)dunn(at)bigredsky(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: Performance 8.4.0
Date: 2009-08-03 02:16:50
Message-ID: 603c8f070908021916r48ebab0ya43e556add3e6a00@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Chris Dunn<chris(dot)dunn(at)bigredsky(dot)com> wrote:
> The database is 8gb currently. Use to be a lot bigger but we removed all large objects out and developed a file server storage for it, and using default page costs for 8.4, I did have it changed in 8.1.4

You might want to play with lowering them. The default page costs
make page accesses expensive relative to per-tuple operations, which
is appropriate if you are I/O-bound but not so much if you are CPU
bound, and especially if the whole database is memory resident. I'd
try something like random_page_cost = seq_page_cost = 0.1 for
starters, or whatever values were working for you in 8.1, but the
sweet spot may be higher or lower.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Suvankar Roy 2009-08-03 04:57:58 Re: Greenplum MapReduce
Previous Message Chris 2009-08-03 02:04:58 Re: Greenplum MapReduce