Re: clang's static checker report.

From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: clang's static checker report.
Date: 2009-09-02 20:46:30
Message-ID: 9BC1BA01-EAB1-4B69-83FE-7F71FA2080C3@pointblue.com.pl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2 Sep 2009, at 21:38, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Grzegorz Jaskiewicz escribió:
>> new report: http://zlew.org/postgresql_static_check/scan-build-2009-09-02-1/
>>
>> archive one dir up, as usual (with index of all previous reports).
>
> What's with the "analyzer failures"? Did you submit bug reports about
> them?

honestly, why would you even ask me such a question....

My currently open bugs:

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4867
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4832

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-02 21:09:02 Re: community decision-making & 8.5
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-02 20:42:59 Re: remove flatfiles.c