Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems
Date: 2006-06-23 00:53:31
Message-ID: 9AE36A0D-5708-46CD-B6CE-332DFFCDD088@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


On Jun 23, 2006, at 9:47 , Michael Glaesemann wrote:

> It also changes the result of the aggregate test for intervals, but
> I think that's to be expected.

My goodness. Of course it changes the aggregate test results. That
was what brought this up in the first place. (*kicks self for not
reading the subject line when responding*)

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2006-06-23 01:17:32 Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-06-23 00:49:35 Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2006-06-23 01:51:38 Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-06-23 00:47:13 Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems