From: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Akmal Akmalhojaev <akmal(dot)ilh(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Role members |
Date: | 2007-05-29 03:32:29 |
Message-ID: | 9AC2CA53-2BE2-4DB3-8902-C9543097424E@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On May 21, 2007, at 8:25 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:21:52PM +0400, Akmal Akmalhojaev wrote:
>> For example I have a role ID1 with members ID2 and ID3.
>> Role ID2 has also members ID4 and ID5. It means that roles ID4 and
>> ID5 are
>> members of ID1.
>> The question: Is there any function in PostgreSQL, that finds all the
>> members of role ID1 - even such members, as ID4 and ID5.
>
> Here's a function I've written in SQL:
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION get_roles_under(OID)
> RETURNS SETOF OID
> LANGUAGE sql
> AS $$
> SELECT
> $1
> UNION
> SELECT
> member
> FROM
> pg_catalog.pg_auth_members
> WHERE
> roleid = $1
> UNION
> SELECT
> get_roles_over(roleid) AS "roleid"
> FROM
> pg_catalog.pg_auth_members
> WHERE
> roleid IN (
> SELECT
> member
> FROM
> pg_catalog.pg_auth_members
> WHERE
> roleid = $1
> )
> $$;
Should that call to get_roles_over be a call to get_roles_under?
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-05-29 03:38:14 | Re: feature suggestions |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2007-05-29 01:34:41 | Re: Stored Procedures Performance: Java vs. PL/Pgsql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2007-05-29 03:53:56 | Re: What is the maximum encoding-conversion growth rate, anyway? |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2007-05-29 03:28:42 | Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions |