| From: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: feature suggestions |
| Date: | 2007-05-29 03:38:14 |
| Message-ID: | 94E4629F-7D53-4282-B676-6F2E3B5AA2D4@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On May 21, 2007, at 1:44 PM, PFC wrote:
> Which list is the most appropriate for proposing features and
> ideas for postgres ?
Well, I think hackers tend to pay more attention to -hackers. OTOH,
in order to get something accepted you've got to show why it should
be accepted, so if it's a brand-new feature it might be a better idea
to post it here and ask folks to reply with real-world cases where
they could use the feature. Keep in mind that the bar is higher if
there's another way to accomplish something; the community generally
doesn't accept things that are purely "syntactic sugar".
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A. Kretschmer | 2007-05-29 04:53:22 | Re: Call a program |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-05-29 03:32:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Role members |