Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date: 2025-07-29 15:40:11
Message-ID: 999003.1753803611@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> OK. I'm inclined to do this after the CF finishes, to avoid collisions
> with other patches. I assume it's going to make the CFbot fairly unhappy.

+1 for proceeding that way. (I did not look at whether the proposed
changes are sane, but I agree that this'll inevitably break a lot of
pending patches.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2025-07-29 15:46:27 Re: Doc update proposal for the note on log_statement in the runtime config for logging page
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2025-07-29 15:32:02 Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files