Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date: 2025-07-29 15:32:02
Message-ID: f485f797-a7a8-43b4-9167-c66442ca3c3b@dunslane.net
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2025-07-29 Tu 2:15 AM, jian he wrote:
> hi.
>
> after run the v2 python script and ``git apply
> v2-0001-update-filelist.sgml-allfiles.sgml.no-cfbot``
> git status -u
> shows:
>
> Changes not staged for commit:
> (use "git add/rm <file>..." to update what will be committed)
> (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
> modified: doc/src/sgml/filelist.sgml
> deleted: doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
>
> That means to verify the changes, we only need to verify html files
> related to "functions".
>
> I use GNU diff to compare the HTML output of doc/src/sgml/func.sgml generated
> from the master branch against the HTML file produced by the patch.
> For example, $DOC9 is the PATCH (split func.sgml) html file directory, $DOC5 is
> the master branch html file directory. and no message produced while running
> diff, which means the patch (with the script) produced output is the
> same as the master branch.

[snip]

OK. I'm inclined to do this after the CF finishes, to avoid collisions
with other patches. I assume it's going to make the CFbot fairly unhappy.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-07-29 15:40:11 Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-07-29 15:27:37 Re: Regression with large XML data input