On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 09:04, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 08:04, Tsutomu Yamada<tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Thank you for correcting patch.
>> However, I think the following block have to use VirualFree*Ex*().
>> (yes, this should never happen, maybe there is actually no problem.
>> but for logical correctness)
> That is definitely correct. I have updated the patch in my tree and
> will make sure to include that in the eventual commit.
> FYI, and others, I have received a couple of off-list reports from
> people testing out the patch, and so far only positive results.
I have applied this patch to HEAD so we can get buildfarm coverage.
Holding back on the batckpatch for a bit longer.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2009-07-24 20:24:28|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2009-07-24 20:12:42|
|Subject: pgsql: Reserve the shared memory region during backend startup on |