Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Date: 2009-07-24 20:13:17
Message-ID: 9837222c0907241313w2d15e86fj38dc5e928b01e6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 09:04, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 08:04, Tsutomu Yamada<tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thank you for correcting patch.
>> However, I think the following block have to use VirualFree*Ex*().
>>
>> (yes, this should never happen, maybe there is actually no problem.
>>  but for logical correctness)
>
> That is definitely correct. I have updated the patch in my tree and
> will make sure to include that in the eventual commit.
>
> FYI, and others, I have received a couple of off-list reports from
> people testing out the patch, and so far only positive results.

I have applied this patch to HEAD so we can get buildfarm coverage.
Holding back on the batckpatch for a bit longer.

--
Magnus Hagander
Self: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-07-24 20:24:28 Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-07-24 20:12:42 pgsql: Reserve the shared memory region during backend startup on