Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms
Date: 2009-07-24 20:24:28
Message-ID: 200907242324.29165.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday 26 June 2009 12:07:24 Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
> Included is a conceptual patch to use intptr_t. Comments are welcome.

After closer inspection, not having a win64 box available, I have my doubts
whether this patch actually does anything. Foremost, it doesn't touch the
definition of the Datum type, which ought to be at the core of a change like
this.

Now I see that you call this a "conceptual patch". Perhaps we should wait
until you have developed it into a complete patch?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-07-24 20:29:34 Re: When is a record NULL?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-07-24 20:13:17 Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows