| From: | dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould) |
|---|---|
| To: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker) |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
| Date: | 1998-05-31 22:07:45 |
| Message-ID: | 9805312207.AA27447@hawk.illustra.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > On Sun, 31 May 1998, David Gould wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks. One question, is there any reason we can't use the intx tests on
> > > > all the platforms? I realize that float it another set of problems, but it
> > > > seems that int should be be the same?
> > >
> > > 10c10
> > > < ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Result too large
> > > ---
> > > > ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Math result not representable
> > >
> > > The changes are more error message relatd then anything...
> > >
> > Thats what I thought. So can we just rename the int*-*BSD.out to int*.out?
>
> No cause then that will break the Linux regression tests :)
For the "int" tests? I hope not. Anyhow, I will test this and see if I can
clean up some regression issues. I plan to break a lot of stuff in the next
few weeks (ok, months) and sure want to be able to count on the regression
suite to help me find my way.
-dg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Gould | 1998-05-31 22:13:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
| Previous Message | David Gould | 1998-05-31 22:05:12 | Re: [HACKERS] custom types and optimization |