Re: Printing LSN made easy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Printing LSN made easy
Date: 2020-11-29 17:10:21
Message-ID: 972603.1606669821@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 04:10:27PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> Off list Craig Ringer suggested introducing a new format specifier
>> similar to %m for LSN but I did not get time to take a look at the
>> relevant code. AFAIU it's available only to elog/ereport, so may not
>> be useful generally. But teaching printf variants about the new format
>> would be the best solution. However, I didn't find any way to do that.

> -1. %m maps to errno, that is much more generic. A set of macros
> that maps to our internal format would be fine enough IMO.

Agreed. snprintf.c is meant to implement a recognized standard
(ok, %m is a GNU extension, but it's still pretty standard).
I'm not on board with putting PG-only extensions in there.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2020-11-29 17:10:55 Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2020-11-29 17:07:58 Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.