From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Printing LSN made easy |
Date: | 2020-11-29 17:10:21 |
Message-ID: | 972603.1606669821@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 04:10:27PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> Off list Craig Ringer suggested introducing a new format specifier
>> similar to %m for LSN but I did not get time to take a look at the
>> relevant code. AFAIU it's available only to elog/ereport, so may not
>> be useful generally. But teaching printf variants about the new format
>> would be the best solution. However, I didn't find any way to do that.
> -1. %m maps to errno, that is much more generic. A set of macros
> that maps to our internal format would be fine enough IMO.
Agreed. snprintf.c is meant to implement a recognized standard
(ok, %m is a GNU extension, but it's still pretty standard).
I'm not on board with putting PG-only extensions in there.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2020-11-29 17:10:55 | Re: Removing unneeded self joins |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2020-11-29 17:07:58 | Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. |