Re: Cancelling parallel query leads to segfault

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cancelling parallel query leads to segfault
Date: 2018-02-06 17:01:08
Message-ID: 97146730-fc27-14ea-d15a-a322ed8cfb5c@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/1/18 20:35, Andres Freund wrote:
> On February 1, 2018 11:13:06 PM GMT+01:00, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>Here is a patch to implement that idea. Do you have a way to test it
>>repeatedly, or do you just randomly cancel queries?
>
> For me cancelling the long running parallel queries I tried reliably
> triggers the issue. I encountered it while cancelling tpch q1 during JIT
> work.

Why does canceling a query result in elog(FATAL)? It should just be
elog(ERROR), which wouldn't trigger this issue.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-02-06 17:06:09 Re: Cancelling parallel query leads to segfault
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-02-06 16:36:50 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning